Proposed flood diversion canal cross sections, 1896

10 June 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Proposed flood diversion canal cross section, 1896. After the ‘Great Flood’ of February 1893, the Water Supply Department and its director, J.B. Henderson, investigated the possibility of building flood diversion canals to protect the city. This cross section map shows one canal leaving from Oxley and the other leaving from Yeronga, both with a common outlet at Tingalpa Creek at the ocean. This map shows that the maximum depth of cutting for the upper canal would be approximately 252 feet and, for a length of around 8.5 miles, the average depth would be about 120 feet. For the lower canal, the maximum cutting depth would be about 170 feet while for a length of around six miles the average depth would be 100 feet. According to Henderson’s report, both canals would have ‘colossal dimensions’ and rival some of the largest canals in the world. As shown by another map depicting the proposal, either canal would require purchasing land between the Brisbane River and Moreton Bay. The canals would also require the construction of several new rail and road bridges, revetting to protect embankments, and finally an inlet weir. According to Henderson’s calculations, the excavation alone would cost £9,523,194 for the upper canal, and about £7,138,000 for the lower canal. In addition to affecting navigability and tidal behaviour of the Brisbane River, the canals would need frequent dredging. Henderson advised parliament to abandon consideration of this and other similar schemes. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Proposed diversion canal scheme, 1896

Australia
10 June 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015

Location

Australia
Water Supply Department

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Proposed flood diversion canal scheme, 1896. Under J.B. Henderson’s direction, the Water Supply Department investigated a variety of flood mitigation schemes to protect Brisbane from future floods. A report was presented to Parliament in 1896 and included this map of two flood diversion canals. According to Henderson, at the time there appeared to be a ‘prevailing belief  ̶  that without difficulty a canal could be formed at some point on the river to the sea by means of which floods below the canal entrance at the river end would be wholly averted.’ However, building them would not be simple. Either canal would involve the purchase of much land, the construction of several new bridges, revetting to protect embankments, and finally an inlet weir. According to Henderson’s calculations, the excavation alone would cost £9,523,194 for the upper Oxley canal, shown in orange, and about £7,138,000 for the lower Yeronga canal shown in light blue. In addition to affecting navigability and tidal behaviour of the Brisbane River, the canals would need frequent dredging. Henderson advised parliament to abandon consideration of this and other similar schemes. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Caboonbah homestead, 1932

1 January 1932
15 April 2015
15 April 2015

Collection of the Fryer Library

Caboonbah homestead, 1932. Overlooking where the Brisbane and the Stanley Rivers combine, this map depicts the scene at which H.P. Somerset saw floodwaters approaching Brisbane in February 1893. A cloudburst in the upper Stanley catchment caused the Brisbane River to rapidly rise in early February where, to the south, he saw the waters submerge a gum tree at 55 feet, exceeding the level of the last major flood in 1890. The whole house shook as the flood waters crashed into the cliff nearly 200 yards away. To the north, he observed that the flat on the far side of the Brisbane River was already flooded. Saw logs were racing upstream a distance back from the river. These were later deposited on a ridge shown. Closer inspection by Somerset later revealed that they were red cedar logs bearing Mr F. Bowman’s brand. These had been felled near the head of the Reedy Creek. This clearly indicated that it was the Stanley River which had carried them downstream. The dam site suggested by Somerset is shown above the junction of the Stanley River and Reedy Creek. Collection of the Fryer Library

Channel widening and river training scheme, 1896

1 January 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Water Supply Department

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Channel widening and river training scheme, 1896. Under the direction J.B Henderson, this channel widening and river training scheme was proposed by the Water Supply Department in 1896. To prevent a repeat of the disastrous 1893 floods, areas shaded orange would be removed to widen the channel. A series of flood walls would also be built to protect the inner city and South Brisbane. Where the walls would abut existing permanent structures, watertight joints would be formed keeping flood waters in the channel. These walls would have gates at key locations only closed in the event of a flood higher than in 1890. In the city, flood gates were proposed on the corner of Creek and Charlotte streets and on the corner of Alice and Edward Streets. In South Brisbane, flood gates were proposed at the end of Russell, Glenelg, Ernest and Tribune streets. This map includes the 1893 flood line and shows only part of the Victoria Bridge which was destroyed during the flood. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Brisbane flood, right bank, 1893

1 January 1893
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Survey Office

Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

10 chains to an inch

Brisbane flood, right bank, 1893. Produced by the Survey Office, this map shows the extent of the 1893 flood on the right bank of the river through West End and South Brisbane. Drawn on existing sheet maps, only one side of the river is shown. Field staff had responsibility for surveying different parts of the city from which a single map could be compiled. This map was stamped by the Survey General’s Office 3 May 1893.

Brisbane flood, left bank, 1893

1 January 1893
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Survey Office

Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

10 chains to an inch

Brisbane flood, left bank, 1893. Produced by the Survey Office, this map shows the extent of the ‘Great Flood’ of February 1893 on the left bank of the Brisbane River through St Lucia, Toowong, Taringa and Auchenflower. Drawn over an existing sheet map of Brisbane, only one side of the river is shown. Field staff surveyed the city one section at a time from which a single map could be compiled. This map is signed by the staff surveyor ‘Mr Bedford’ and dated 25 March 1893. Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

Built around a tidal river, some 20 km from Moreton Bay, Brisbane often floods, usually in conjunction with La Niña events bringing heavy wet conditions and cyclonic activity across the state.

Fort Lytton on Brisbane River, 2007

Brisbane and Suburbs showing Mount Coot-tha Park, 1905

Mount Coot-tha, QLD
Australia
27° 29' 6.5832" S, 152° 57' 33.0876" E
1 January 1905
4 May 2011
4 May 2011

Location

Mount Coot-tha, QLD
Australia
27° 29' 6.5832" S, 152° 57' 33.0876" E
Brisbane
Department of Lands

Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland 2011

Eight chains to an inch

Brisbane and Suburbs showing Mount Coot-tha Park, 1905. This map, sheet seven, formed part of a series of Brisbane sheet maps originally drawn by government lithographer A.R. McKellar and published by the Surveyor-General’s Office, Brisbane 1895. Comprised of 13 sheets, the 1895 edition was printed with the scale of six chains to an inch and contained minimal topographic information on Mount Coot-tha Park. Despite the larger scale of eight chains to an inch, the 1905 edition of McKellar’s maps provided significant detail. The topographic relief in this map gathers towards Mount Coot-tha (in the bottom left) and Taylors Range. One Tree Hill, that has the trigonometric station and the lookout-pavilion, are measured at 746 feet. On the base of the mountain a walking track and mine shaft are marked. Mount Constitution has a measured elevation of 844 feet. A track leads to the summit after crossing below ‘Ithaca Falls’. In 1905, the price of this map was six shillings and two pence. The entire set comprised 12 sheets and cost 25 shillings. The Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying, DERM, Brisbane

Brisbane and Suburbs showing Mount Coot-tha Park, 1895

Mount Coot-tha, QLD
Australia
27° 29' 6.5832" S, 152° 57' 33.0876" E
1 January 1895
4 May 2011
4 May 2011

Location

Mount Coot-tha, QLD
Australia
27° 29' 6.5832" S, 152° 57' 33.0876" E
Brisbane
Department of Lands

Collection of the Centre for the Government of Queensland

Six chains to an inch

Brisbane and Suburbs showing Mount Coot-tha Park, 1895. This map, sheet seven, formed part of a series of Brisbane sheet maps drawn by government lithographer A.R. McKellar and published by the Surveyor-General’s Office, Brisbane 1895.  Comprised of 13 sheets, ‘McKellar’s Official Map of Brisbane and Suburbs’ was printed at the scale of six chains to an inch and contained minimal topographic information on Mount Coot-tha Park. Shown mainly as blank space, Mount Coot-tha Park and Toowong Cemetery contrast with the intricate detail on roads, suburbs and train lines. The outline of East Ithaca Creek and a track leading up it from the Ben Nevis estate provide the only indication of undulating relief. This dearth of topographic information was rectified in a later edition of McKellar’s maps. Collection of the Centre for the Government of Queensland

Syndicate content