- Home
- Quintessential Queensland
- Distinctiveness
- Perceptions
- Perceptions: how people understand the landscape
- From runs to closer settlement
- Geological survey of Queensland
- Mapping a new colony, 1860-80
- Mapping the Torres Strait: from TI to Magani Malu and Zenadh Kes
- Order in Paradise: a colonial gold field
- Queensland atlas, 1865
- Queensland mapping since 1900
- Queensland: the slogan state
- Rainforests of North Queensland
- Walkabout
- Queenslanders
- Queenslanders: people in the landscape
- Aboriginal heroes: episodes in the colonial landscape
- Australian South Sea Islanders
- Cane fields and solidarity in the multiethnic north
- Chinatowns
- Colonial immigration to Queensland
- Greek Cafés in the landscape of Queensland
- Hispanics and human rights in Queensland’s public spaces
- Italians in north Queensland
- Lebanese in rural Queensland
- Queensland clothing
- Queensland for ‘the best kind of population, primary producers’
- Too remote, too primitive and too expensive: Scandinavian settlers in colonial Queensland
- Distance
- Movement
- Movement: how people move through the landscape
- Air travel in Queensland
- Bicycling through Brisbane, 1896
- Cobb & Co
- Journey to Hayman Island, 1938
- Law and story-strings
- Mobile kids: children’s explorations of Cherbourg
- Movable heritage of North Queensland
- Passages to India: military linkages with Queensland
- The Queen in Queensland, 1954
- Transient Chinese in colonial Queensland
- Travelling times by rail
- Pathways
- Pathways: how things move through the landscape and where they are made
- Aboriginal dreaming paths and trading ways
- Chinese traders in the nineteenth century
- Introducing the cane toad
- Pituri bag
- Press and the media
- Radio in Queensland
- Red Cross Society and World War I in Queensland
- The telephone in Queensland
- Where did the trams go?
- ‘A little bit of love for me and a murder for my old man’: the Queensland Bush Book Club
- Movement
- Division
- Separation
- Separation: divisions in the landscape
- Asylums in the landscape
- Brisbane River
- Changing landscape of radicalism
- Civil government boundaries
- Convict Brisbane
- Dividing Queensland - Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party
- High water mark: the shifting electoral landscape 2001-12
- Hospitals in the landscape
- Indigenous health
- Palm Island
- Secession movements
- Separate spheres: gender and dress codes
- Separating land, separating culture
- Stone walls do a prison make: law on the landscape
- The 1967 Referendum – the State comes together?
- Utopian communities
- Whiteness in the tropics
- Conflict
- Conflict: how people contest the landscape
- A tale of two elections – One Nation and political protest
- Battle of Brisbane – Australian masculinity under threat
- Dangerous spaces - youth politics in Brisbane, 1960s-70s
- Fortress Queensland 1942-45
- Grassy hills: colonial defence and coastal forts
- Great Shearers’ Strike of 1891
- Iwasaki project
- Johannes Bjelke-Petersen: straddling a barbed wire fence
- Mount Etna: Queensland's longest environmental conflict
- Native Police
- Skyrail Cairns (Research notes)
- Staunch but conservative – the trade union movement in Rockhampton
- The Chinese question
- Thomas Wentworth Wills and Cullin-la-ringo Station
- Separation
- Dreaming
- Imagination
- Imagination: how people have imagined Queensland
- Brisbane River and Moreton Bay: Thomas Welsby
- Changing views of the Glasshouse Mountains
- Imagining Queensland in film and television production
- Jacaranda
- Literary mapping of Brisbane in the 1990s
- Looking at Mount Coot-tha
- Mapping the Macqueen farm
- Mapping the mythic: Hugh Sawrey's ‘outback’
- People’s Republic of Woodford
- Poinsettia city: Brisbane’s flower
- The Pineapple Girl
- The writers of Tamborine Mountain
- Vance and Nettie Palmer
- Memory
- Memory: how people remember the landscape
- Anna Wickham: the memory of a moment
- Berajondo and Mill Point: remembering place and landscape
- Cemeteries in the landscape
- Landscapes of memory: Tjapukai Dance Theatre and Laura Festival
- Monuments and memory: T.J. Byrnes and T.J. Ryan
- Out where the dead towns lie
- Queensland in miniature: the Brisbane Exhibition
- Roadside ++++ memorials
- Shipwrecks as graves
- The Dame in the tropics: Nellie Melba
- Tinnenburra
- Vanished heritage
- War memorials
- Curiosity
- Curiosity: knowledge through the landscape
- A playground for science: Great Barrier Reef
- Duboisia hopwoodii: a colonial curiosity
- Great Artesian Basin: water from deeper down
- In search of Landsborough
- James Cook’s hundred days in Queensland
- Mutual curiosity – Aboriginal people and explorers
- Queensland Acclimatisation Society
- Queensland’s own sea monster: a curious tale of loss and regret
- St Lucia: degrees of landscape
- Townsville’s Mount St John Zoo
- Imagination
- Development
- Exploitation
- Transformation
- Transformation: how the landscape has changed and been modified
- Cultivation
- Empire and agribusiness: the Australian Mercantile Land and Finance Company
- Gold
- Kill, cure, or strangle: Atherton Tablelands
- National parks in Queensland
- Pastoralism 1860s–1915
- Prickly pear
- Repurchasing estates: the transformation of Durundur
- Soil
- Sugar
- Sunshine Coast
- The Brigalow
- Walter Reid Cultural Centre, Rockhampton: back again
- Survival
- Survival: how the landscape impacts on people
- Brisbane floods: 1893 to the summer of sorrow
- City of the Damned: how the media embraced the Brisbane floods
- Depression era
- Did Clem Jones save Brisbane from flood?
- Droughts and floods and rail
- Missions and reserves
- Queensland British Food Corporation
- Rockhampton’s great flood of 1918
- Station homesteads
- Tropical cyclones
- Wreck of the Quetta
- Pleasure
- Pleasure: how people enjoy the landscape
- Bushwalking in Queensland
- Cherbourg that’s my home: celebrating landscape through song
- Creating rural attractions
- Festivals
- Queer pleasure: masculinity, male homosexuality and public space
- Railway refreshment rooms
- Regional cinema
- Schoolies week: a festival of misrule
- The sporting landscape
- Visiting the Great Barrier Reef
By:
Melissa Harper National parks are an important part of the national estate. In 2010 Queensland had just over 250 national parks, covering 8,138,792 hectares and encompassing a broad range of landscapes and ecosystems. Each park is considered an ‘outstanding example of Queensland’s natural environment and cultural heritage’ according to the Department of Environment and Resource Management. Most people who visit a national park go to experience nature and admire beautiful scenery. This is one of their central functions but it is not the fundamental reason why national parks are declared. Rather, national parks aim to protect and conserve biodiversity and to guard against human interference. Sustainability is now the key principle that guides how national parks are used and who they are for.
Queensland lagged behind much of Australia in the protection of its natural environment. In 1879 Australia’s first national park, National Park (now Royal National Park) was established 20 kilometres to the south-west of Sydney. Conceived as a place of ‘public recreation’, National Park consisted of 7500 hectares of bushland. A number of the other colonies followed suit: South Australia with Belair in 1891 and Victoria with Wilson’s Promontory and Mount Buffalo in 1898. While there were certainly activists lobbying hard for land to be set aside as a national park, Queenslanders had to wait until March 1908 for the first park, 131 hectares at Witches Falls in Tamborine, to be declared. It now forms part of the Tamborine National Park. Although only a small area it did signal a growing recognition of the need to preserve native fauna and flora, in this case against the incursions of agriculture. A more substantial park quickly followed with the declaration in July of 9000 hectares at Bunya Mountains. Here too lobbyists had fought hard to protect the area from economic development. Another park at Cunningham’s Gap was added in 1909 and by 1910 Queensland had seven national parks, the majority close to Brisbane. They became popular places of resort for harried urban dwellers.
Lamington National Park
The most significant of Queensland’s early parks is Lamington National Park, located in the McPherson Ranges. Gazetted in 1915, the park encompassed 19,000 hectares of land, home to lush rainforests, waterfalls and varied birdlife. Interestingly its two main champions, Robert Collins and Romeo Lahey, both had backgrounds linked to the exploitation of rural resources. Collins was a pastoralist and Lahey the son of one of Queensland’s largest sawmillers.
In 1930, Lahey and Arthur Groom established the National Parks Association of Queensland (NPAQ). As reported in the Brisbane Courier, 16 April 1930, the association aimed to ‘preserve intact in their natural condition the existing national parks of Queensland and to secure the reservation of other suitable areas before it is too late’. It consistently lobbied for more national parks and spoke out against proposals to build roads and luxury hotels in parks. During the 1930s the Association had a number of successes and by 1940 Queensland had 183 national parks covering a total area of 217,208 hectares. This dramatic increase was in part due to the declaration of one hundred island parks off the coast, many of them very small in size and considered worthless for any other use.
Economic interests
In Queensland, as elsewhere in Australia, national park status did not necessarily guarantee protection from development and resource extraction. Timber getting, for example, continued in the Bunya Mountains as did road building and grazing. Until the 1970s national parks were managed by the Department of Forestry and the ethos of conservation was sometimes overshadowed by the demands of powerful economic interests or simply by a lack of resources. Calls for the development of parks often came from tourist interests who wanted to make them more accessible. Such demands were largely resisted. As quoted by the historian Wendy Goldstein, in 1947 the director of forestry stated that ‘any “development” of parks must be based on the cardinal principle that they must be preserved as far as possible, in that simplicity and unspoiled beauty makes them unique, and not...cheapened to the level of hundreds of tourist resorts’.
Many Queenslanders were enthusiastic in their embrace of the recreational possibilities of national parks. Picnics, walking, rock climbing, bird watching and camping were all popular activities. By 1955 annual visitation to Queensland’s national parks reached half a million people and just over a decade later the figure climbed to one million.
Conservation ethos
At the same time that parks grew in popularity, the philosophy that underpinned them began to move towards protecting biodiversity against human interference rather than protecting nature’s beauty to serve the needs of people. When the management of parks came under the National Parks and Wildlife Service in 1975 it was the first time the parks were managed by a conservation agency. The decades that followed were important in the growth of Queensland’s national park system. In 1968 just 0.54 per cent of Queensland’s total area was reserved as national park. By 1991 that figure had grown to 2.1 per cent. This was, however, still significantly lower than every other state in Australia. And yet the expansion was met with ‘fierce and often acrimonious opposition’, critics concerned that it represented a ‘land grab’.
The 1992 Nature Conservation Act, implemented by the Labor government, was an important step in giving priority to the protection of biodiversity. According to the National Parks Association of Queensland, the ‘cardinal principle of management’ had now become ‘to provide, to the greatest possible extent, for the permanent preservation of the area’s natural condition and the protection of the area’s cultural resources and values’. Any use of such an area was to be ‘nature-based and ecologically sustainable’. In addition to ‘general’ national parks the act enabled the declaration of scientific national parks ‘to protect places or species with exceptional scientific value’. These parks cannot be used for recreation and entry is by permit only.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Parks
The Act also recognised the significance of land within Indigenous culture in the creation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Parks. These are managed as national parks but where possible allow for the practice of traditional customs. This has sometimes resulted in conflict particularly when Indigenous cultural practices might go against western ideas of nature conservation. The government went a step further in 2007 with the establishment of a new class of national park on Cape York Peninsula. These parks, known as Cape York Peninsula Aboriginal land (CYPAL) ‘allow for existing and proposed national parks to become Aboriginal land’. Ownership is granted to the Traditional Owners on the understanding that the land is jointly managed with the government as a national park.
Expanding the number of national parks and, in particular, ensuring that parks adequately represent the range of diversity of Queensland’s ecosystems, are ongoing projects. But while protecting biodiversity remains the cardinal principle it continues to rub against the competing demands of park users. National parks are a crucial part of the lucrative tourist industry, attracting more than 13 million visits per year. A consistent challenge for park management is how to balance the needs of animals, plants and habitats with those of people. Queensland’s national park system remains a work in progress.
References and Further reading (Note):
National parks, marine parks and forests’, http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/parks_and_forests/index.html
References and Further reading (Note):
Warwick Frost, ‘Tourism, rainforests and worthless lands: the origins of national parks in Queensland’, Tourism geographies, 6/4, 2004
References and Further reading (Note):
Wendy Goldstein (ed), Australia’s 100 years of national parks, Sydney, National Parks and Wildlife Service, 1979
References and Further reading (Note):
Geoffrey Charles Westcott, ‘Australia’s distinctive national parks system’, Environmental conservation, 18/4, 1991
References and Further reading (Note):
Paul Sattler, ‘Queensland’s national parks: an investment in our future’, Thirteenth Romeo W Lahey Memorial Lecture to the National Parks Association of Queensland Inc, 2000
References and Further reading (Note):
‘National parks’, www.npaq.org.au