- Home
- Quintessential Queensland
- Distinctiveness
- Perceptions
- Perceptions: how people understand the landscape
- From runs to closer settlement
- Geological survey of Queensland
- Mapping a new colony, 1860-80
- Mapping the Torres Strait: from TI to Magani Malu and Zenadh Kes
- Order in Paradise: a colonial gold field
- Queensland atlas, 1865
- Queensland mapping since 1900
- Queensland: the slogan state
- Rainforests of North Queensland
- Walkabout
- Queenslanders
- Queenslanders: people in the landscape
- Aboriginal heroes: episodes in the colonial landscape
- Australian South Sea Islanders
- Cane fields and solidarity in the multiethnic north
- Chinatowns
- Colonial immigration to Queensland
- Greek Cafés in the landscape of Queensland
- Hispanics and human rights in Queensland’s public spaces
- Italians in north Queensland
- Lebanese in rural Queensland
- Queensland clothing
- Queensland for ‘the best kind of population, primary producers’
- Too remote, too primitive and too expensive: Scandinavian settlers in colonial Queensland
- Distance
- Movement
- Movement: how people move through the landscape
- Air travel in Queensland
- Bicycling through Brisbane, 1896
- Cobb & Co
- Journey to Hayman Island, 1938
- Law and story-strings
- Mobile kids: children’s explorations of Cherbourg
- Movable heritage of North Queensland
- Passages to India: military linkages with Queensland
- The Queen in Queensland, 1954
- Transient Chinese in colonial Queensland
- Travelling times by rail
- Pathways
- Pathways: how things move through the landscape and where they are made
- Aboriginal dreaming paths and trading ways
- Chinese traders in the nineteenth century
- Introducing the cane toad
- Pituri bag
- Press and the media
- Radio in Queensland
- Red Cross Society and World War I in Queensland
- The telephone in Queensland
- Where did the trams go?
- ‘A little bit of love for me and a murder for my old man’: the Queensland Bush Book Club
- Movement
- Division
- Separation
- Separation: divisions in the landscape
- Asylums in the landscape
- Brisbane River
- Changing landscape of radicalism
- Civil government boundaries
- Convict Brisbane
- Dividing Queensland - Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party
- High water mark: the shifting electoral landscape 2001-12
- Hospitals in the landscape
- Indigenous health
- Palm Island
- Secession movements
- Separate spheres: gender and dress codes
- Separating land, separating culture
- Stone walls do a prison make: law on the landscape
- The 1967 Referendum – the State comes together?
- Utopian communities
- Whiteness in the tropics
- Conflict
- Conflict: how people contest the landscape
- A tale of two elections – One Nation and political protest
- Battle of Brisbane – Australian masculinity under threat
- Dangerous spaces - youth politics in Brisbane, 1960s-70s
- Fortress Queensland 1942-45
- Grassy hills: colonial defence and coastal forts
- Great Shearers’ Strike of 1891
- Iwasaki project
- Johannes Bjelke-Petersen: straddling a barbed wire fence
- Mount Etna: Queensland's longest environmental conflict
- Native Police
- Skyrail Cairns (Research notes)
- Staunch but conservative – the trade union movement in Rockhampton
- The Chinese question
- Thomas Wentworth Wills and Cullin-la-ringo Station
- Separation
- Dreaming
- Imagination
- Imagination: how people have imagined Queensland
- Brisbane River and Moreton Bay: Thomas Welsby
- Changing views of the Glasshouse Mountains
- Imagining Queensland in film and television production
- Jacaranda
- Literary mapping of Brisbane in the 1990s
- Looking at Mount Coot-tha
- Mapping the Macqueen farm
- Mapping the mythic: Hugh Sawrey's ‘outback’
- People’s Republic of Woodford
- Poinsettia city: Brisbane’s flower
- The Pineapple Girl
- The writers of Tamborine Mountain
- Vance and Nettie Palmer
- Memory
- Memory: how people remember the landscape
- Anna Wickham: the memory of a moment
- Berajondo and Mill Point: remembering place and landscape
- Cemeteries in the landscape
- Landscapes of memory: Tjapukai Dance Theatre and Laura Festival
- Monuments and memory: T.J. Byrnes and T.J. Ryan
- Out where the dead towns lie
- Queensland in miniature: the Brisbane Exhibition
- Roadside ++++ memorials
- Shipwrecks as graves
- The Dame in the tropics: Nellie Melba
- Tinnenburra
- Vanished heritage
- War memorials
- Curiosity
- Curiosity: knowledge through the landscape
- A playground for science: Great Barrier Reef
- Duboisia hopwoodii: a colonial curiosity
- Great Artesian Basin: water from deeper down
- In search of Landsborough
- James Cook’s hundred days in Queensland
- Mutual curiosity – Aboriginal people and explorers
- Queensland Acclimatisation Society
- Queensland’s own sea monster: a curious tale of loss and regret
- St Lucia: degrees of landscape
- Townsville’s Mount St John Zoo
- Imagination
- Development
- Exploitation
- Transformation
- Transformation: how the landscape has changed and been modified
- Cultivation
- Empire and agribusiness: the Australian Mercantile Land and Finance Company
- Gold
- Kill, cure, or strangle: Atherton Tablelands
- National parks in Queensland
- Pastoralism 1860s–1915
- Prickly pear
- Repurchasing estates: the transformation of Durundur
- Soil
- Sugar
- Sunshine Coast
- The Brigalow
- Walter Reid Cultural Centre, Rockhampton: back again
- Survival
- Survival: how the landscape impacts on people
- Brisbane floods: 1893 to the summer of sorrow
- City of the Damned: how the media embraced the Brisbane floods
- Depression era
- Did Clem Jones save Brisbane from flood?
- Droughts and floods and rail
- Missions and reserves
- Queensland British Food Corporation
- Rockhampton’s great flood of 1918
- Station homesteads
- Tropical cyclones
- Wreck of the Quetta
- Pleasure
- Pleasure: how people enjoy the landscape
- Bushwalking in Queensland
- Cherbourg that’s my home: celebrating landscape through song
- Creating rural attractions
- Festivals
- Queer pleasure: masculinity, male homosexuality and public space
- Railway refreshment rooms
- Regional cinema
- Schoolies week: a festival of misrule
- The sporting landscape
- Visiting the Great Barrier Reef
By:
Val Donovan Explorer’s journals provide a fascinating insight into two peoples of different cultures becoming acquainted with each other. Although the primary motive for the explorers was curiosity about the geographical and geological landscape, they became very curious about the Aboriginal people who occupied this land. In turn, their journals reflect just how curious the Traditional Owners were about the strangers who were entering their country. This mutual curiosity led to invaluable knowledge not only of the physical landscape, but about the people they were meeting for the first time.
Making connections
The first white people that inland Aboriginals had ever seen were inland explorers who ventured north in the 1840s to what is now Queensland. The explorers were curious to know if the landscape was useful for settlement, and they hoped to rely on the knowledge of local Aboriginals to show them where the rivers were and to ask what they called their rivers and mountains. The explorers knew the Aboriginal people were there. Thomas Mitchell’s journal entry for 9 March 1845 showed that his expedition party ‘had followed the well-beaten paths of the natives during the whole of this day’s ride, and most anxious my guides and I to see them; but they avoided us’. Mitchell later commented on the astonishment of the Aboriginal people near the Balonne River when they first saw him mount his horse and ride away towards the mountains. Imagine their curiosity, as they had never seen either a white man, who was almost totally covered with clothing, or a horse before. When Ludwig Leichhardt frightened an old woman and a child on an Aboriginal pathway in north Queensland, the woman seized the child and ran off into the bush. The feeling of curiosity about each other was mutual. Leichhardt put this into words in his journal in 1845 when he wrote of the old woman: ‘What could she think but that we were some of those imaginary beings?’
Could we but have understood each other
The various Aboriginal groups reacted differently to the presence of explorers. Some came to the camp, as did a group of fourteen accompanied by Youranigh, Mitchell’s Aboriginal guide, ‘who, all curiosity, passed the night at our camp...’. Many though were more timid; it was reported that ‘the natives were seen first looking at us, and then running off’. On 3 May, three from an Aboriginal camp came to Mitchell’s tents and he recorded:
One stood amongst the carts and tents, apparently quite absorbed in observation. Intense curiosity in these men had evidently overcome all their fears of such strangers.
While the Aboriginal man was showing his curiosity about the strange happenings in his country, Mitchell in turn, in his journal entry, reflected his own curiosity about this group of people:
They were entirely naked... With steady fixed looks, eyes wide open, and serious intelligent countenances, what passed in their minds was not disguised, as is usual with savages. On the contrary, there was a manly openness of countenance, and a look of good sense about them, which would have gained all my confidence, could we but have understood each other... Yuranigh [sic] plied them with all my questions, but to little purpose; for although he could understand their language, he complained that they did not answer him in it, but repeated, like parrots, whatever he said to them... They had never seen white man before, and behaved as properly as it was possible for men in their situation to do.
It is interesting to contemplate what was happening here. Were the Aboriginal men purposely not answering Mitchell’s questions, as they possibly understood what the guide, who was from nearby country, was saying? It was also interesting that Mitchell, even though he had called them ‘savages’ was judging the Aboriginal men by white man’s standards in saying that they ‘behaved as properly as it was possible’.
Leichhardt was also curious about the Aboriginal languages, which he had difficulty in understanding. As the explorer entered a new group’s country the language changed. On approaching Port Essington towards the end of his exploratory journey Leichhardt recorded, on 27 November 1845, that the people who were camped at a pool near them:
...continually used the words “Perikot, Nōkot, Mankiterre, Lumbo Lumbo, Nana Nana Nana,” all of which we did not understand till after our arrival at Port Essington, where we learned that they meant “Very good, no good, Malays very far.” Their intonation was extremely melodious...
On this occasion Leichhardt found out the meaning of the words, but many conflicts arose due to lack of understanding. On many occasions explorers waved a green branch as a token of peace while approaching the Aboriginal people, but did the Aboriginals understand what this meant?
Desire for knowledge
It became apparent to the explorers that the Aboriginal people wished to learn from these new experiences. When in the north Leichhardt reported that males of every age flocked around them:
They observed with curious eye, everything we did... Our eating, drinking, dress, skin, combing...everything...was earnestly discussed...
William Hodgkinson had the same experience when some of his men were sinking a well to procure water: ‘The progress of the sinking was most attentively watched by three blacks, who clearly evinced their interest in the subject by signs...’.
Curiosity recorded in an Aboriginal journal
Explorers were not the only ones taking notes of people they had not encountered before, but the notes by Aboriginal people were not in a written journal. Instead they were in the form of drawings on cave walls or escarpments. Robert Logan Jack, the Government Geologist, came upon these drawings in the Palmer goldfield. He thought some drawings were not more than twenty-five years old. This would suggest that the human figure with an unmistakeable hat on its head was possibly observed by the Aboriginal artist about the time that the Palmer goldfields became active in the early 1870s.
There were some explorers, such as the infamous Burke and Wills, who did not rely on local Aboriginal knowledge and their expeditions ended in failure. The journals of the above explorers reflect a mutual curiosity which led to a lot of interaction between the groups. The Aboriginals usually assisted, sharing their knowledge of the landscape, while gaining knowledge about the white men.
References and Further reading (Note):
Val Donovan, The reality of a dark history: from contact and conflict to cultural recognition, Brisbane, Arts Queensland, 2008 (2002)
References and Further reading (Note):
Val Donovan and Colleen Wall (eds), Making connections: a journey along the Central Australian Aboriginal trading routes, Brisbane, Arts Queensland, 2004
References and Further reading (Note):
T.L. Mitchell, Journal of an expedition into the interior of tropical Australia, in search of a route to the Gulf of Carpentaria, New York: Longmans, 1848 (1969)
References and Further reading (Note):
Ludwig Leichhardt, Journal of an overland expedition in Australia from Moreton Bay to Port Essington, a distance of upwards of 3000 miles, during the years, 1844-1845, London, T & W Boone, 1847; Adelaide, Library Board of South Australia, 1964
References and Further reading (Note):
W.O. Hodgkinson, ‘Diary of the north-western expedition’ appended to ‘North-west explorations’, 24 January 1877, Votes and proceedings of the Legislative Assembly, 1877, vol 3
References and Further reading (Note):
Robert L Jack, ‘On Aboriginal cave-drawings on the Palmer Goldfield’ [Read before the Royal Society of Queensland, December 14, 1895], The proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, Brisbane, Warwick & Sapsford, vol XI, 1895
References and Further reading (Note):
Sarah Murgatroyd, The dig tree: the story of Burke and Wills, Melbourne, Text Publishing, 2002